Bonner v. Quackenbush

51 Cal. 180
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1875·No. No. 4833·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

In the bill of exceptions there is no specification of the [181] particulars in which the evidence is insufficient to justify the findings and decision of the court. We cannot, therefore, review the evidence nor inquire whether it supports the findings; and assuming the findings to be correct, they fully support the judgment. The only alleged error in law specified in the bill of exceptions has not been relied upon in argument here, nor in the brief of counsel, and we infer has been abandoned as untenable.

Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonner v. Quackenbush, 51 Cal. 180 (Cal. 1875).

51 Cal. 180 (Bonner v. Quackenbush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Lamb
35 P. 306 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
City of San Francisco v. Pacific Bank
26 P. 615 (California Supreme Court, 1891)