Bonner v. Quackenbush
Opinion
In the bill of exceptions there is no specification of the [181] particulars in which the evidence is insufficient to justify the findings and decision of the court. We cannot, therefore, review the evidence nor inquire whether it supports the findings; and assuming the findings to be correct, they fully support the judgment. The only alleged error in law specified in the bill of exceptions has not been relied upon in argument here, nor in the brief of counsel, and we infer has been abandoned as untenable.
Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
51 Cal. 180 (Bonner v. Quackenbush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.