Bonner v. Quackenbush

California Supreme Court

Bonner v. Quackenbush

51 Cal. 180

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1875

DocketNo. 4833

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 Cal. 180 (Bonner v. Quackenbush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonner v. Quackenbush, 51 Cal. 180 (Cal. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

In the bill of exceptions there is no specification of the [181]*181particulars in which the evidence is insufficient to justify the findings and decision of the court. We cannot, therefore, review the evidence nor inquire whether it supports the findings; and assuming the findings to be correct, they fully support the judgment. The only alleged error in law specified in the bill of exceptions has not been relied upon in argument here, nor in the brief of counsel, and we infer has been abandoned as untenable.

Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

In the bill of exceptions there is no specification of the [181]*181particulars in which the evidence is insufficient to justify the findings and decision of the court. We cannot, therefore, review the evidence nor inquire whether it supports the findings; and assuming the findings to be correct, they fully support the judgment. The only alleged error in law specified in the bill of exceptions has not been relied upon in argument here, nor in the brief of counsel, and we infer has been abandoned as untenable.

Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Cal. 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonner-v-quackenbush-cal-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack