Bonner v. Middlebrooks

Supreme Court

Bonner v. Middlebrooks

262 U.S. 729, 43 S. Ct. 522, 67 L. Ed. 1204, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2686

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 30, 1923·No. No. 288·Published

Opinion

Per Curium.

Dismissed with costs for want of jurisdic[730] tion upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.

Mr. John Randolph Cooper, with whom Mr. W. O. Cooper, Jr., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. George M. Napier and Mr. Seward M. Smith, for appellee, submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curium.

Dismissed with costs for want of jurisdic[730] tion upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.

Mr. John Randolph Cooper, with whom Mr. W. O. Cooper, Jr., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. George M. Napier and Mr. Seward M. Smith, for appellee, submitted.

Bonner v. Middlebrooks, 262 U.S. 729, 43 S. Ct. 522, 67 L. Ed. 1204, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2686 (1923).

Pincite

262 U.S. 729 (Bonner v. Middlebrooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related