Bonner v. Kinchen Little

29 Ga. 538
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 Ga. 538 (Bonner v. Kinchen Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonner v. Kinchen Little, 29 Ga. 538 (Ga. 1859).

Opinion

— Stephens J.

By the Court.

delivering the opinion.

We think it is vevy plain that under our claim laws, the claim fe perfectly well made when the claimant has made the legal affidavit, and given the requisite claim bond for damages, &c. The forthcoming bond is a privilege to the claimant, and not a requisite with which he must comply. By it he has a right to the possession of the property until the sale; if he can get that possession without it, that is a matter between him and the Sheriff, not affecting in she slightest degree the interest of the plaintiff in execution. The judgment dismissing the claim in this case, must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norris v. McDaniel
57 S.E.2d 299 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Reynolds Banking Co. v. Southern Pacific Guano Co.
79 S.E. 132 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Ga. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonner-v-kinchen-little-ga-1859.