Bonner v. Gorman

101 S.W. 1153, 82 Ark. 423, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 359
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided April 22, 1907·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam,

This is a motion to advance and affirm this case as a delay case.

The only question in the case is whether the decree is in conformity to the mandate of this court. The record has been • carefully looked into, and the decree found to be in strict accord with the mandate and opinion of the court, and there is nothing new for consideration. Ordinarily, this would stamp this case as a delay case, and it should be advanced1 and affirmed, and under the practice in such cases the ten per cent, penalty would be added. But it is evident from the record that the appellant has brought this case here in order to seek a writ of error -to the Supreme Court of the United States. It will be with the Chief Justice to -decide whether there is a -Federal question herein; but when a case is manifestly brought here in good faith to obtain a review in the Federal Supreme Court, although there is nothing in it for this court to consider, yet such object prevents it being the class of cases where the penalty should be inflicted.

The cause is advanced, and judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonner v. Gorman, 101 S.W. 1153, 82 Ark. 423, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 359 (Ark. 1907).

101 S.W. 1153 (Bonner v. Gorman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klam v. Boehm
240 P.2d 484 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1952)
Bonner v. Gorman
213 U.S. 86 (Supreme Court, 1909)