Bonner v. First Nat. Bank of Athens

248 F. 692, 160 C.C.A. 592, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1468
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 11, 1918
DocketNo. 3051
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 248 F. 692 (Bonner v. First Nat. Bank of Athens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonner v. First Nat. Bank of Athens, 248 F. 692, 160 C.C.A. 592, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1468 (5th Cir. 1918).

Opinion

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

[1, 2] By the judgment presented for review the asserted right of a trustee in bankruptcy to recover property transferred by the bankrupt by a mortgage executed more than four months before the petition in bankruptcy was filed, but recorded within that time, was denied. The averments of the petition did not show that the mortgage was invalid under the law of Texas, in which state it was made. Under the law of that state it was not necessary to record the mortgage to make it valid against creditors other than lien creditors. Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Pipkin Drug Co., 136 Fed. 396, 69 C. C. A. 240. It has been settled by authoritative rulings that under section 47a of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended in 1910 (36 Stat. 838, 840), the trustee in bankruptcy takes the status of a lien creditor as of the time the petition in bankruptcy is filed, and that under section 60 of that act, as the same has been amended, such a mortgage as the one in question in this case does not constitute a voidable preference. Martin v. Commercial National Bank, 245 U. S. 513, 38 Sup. Ct. 176, 62 L. Ed. -, January 14, 1918; Carey v. Donohue, 240 U. S. 430; Martin v. Commercial National Bank, 228 Fed. 651, 143 C. C. A. 173. The mortgage was recorded before the right as a lien creditor of any one other than the mortgagee attached, and is not subordinated to the subsequently attaching right of the trustee.

The judgment under review is supported by the rulings mentioned. It is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barber v. Reina Nash Motor Company
260 P.2d 928 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1953)
American Nat. Bank v. Harris
84 F.2d 181 (Tenth Circuit, 1936)
In re Finley
6 F. Supp. 105 (M.D. North Carolina, 1933)
In re Lindahl
59 F.2d 91 (S.D. Texas, 1932)
Peter Schuttler Co. v. Gunther
192 N.W. 661 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1923)
Jones v. Bank of Excelsior Springs
213 S.W. 892 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 F. 692, 160 C.C.A. 592, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonner-v-first-nat-bank-of-athens-ca5-1918.