Bonner, Ex Parte Virdis L.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Bonner, Ex Parte Virdis L.

DecidedMay 12, 2004

DocketAP-74,947

StatusPublished

This text of Bonner, Ex Parte Virdis L. (Bonner, Ex Parte Virdis L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonner, Ex Parte Virdis L., (Tex. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. 74,947 EX PARTE VIRDIS BONNER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM BOWIE COUNTY

Per Curiam.

OPINION

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was transmitted to this Court by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Ex Parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault on a public servant and sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Although Applicant attempted to appeal his conviction, his appeal was dismissed as untimely. Bonner v. State, No. 06-02-00066-CR (Tex. App. -- Texarkana 2002, no pet.).

Applicant contends, among other things, that he was deprived of his right to appeal because trial counsel failed to file a timely notice of appeal due to the ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

After a review of the record, we find that Applicant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal in cause number 96-F-0343-202 from the 202nd Judicial District Court of Bowie County, Texas, because counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700, 703 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369, 373-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Applicant is ordered returned to that point in time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the sentences had been imposed on the date that the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to see that a written notice of appeal is given within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued. Applicant's remaining grounds for relief are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469, 472 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

DELIVERED: May 12, 2004

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. 74,947 EX PARTE VIRDIS BONNER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM BOWIE COUNTY

Per Curiam.

OPINION

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was transmitted to this Court by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Ex Parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault on a public servant and sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Although Applicant attempted to appeal his conviction, his appeal was dismissed as untimely. Bonner v. State, No. 06-02-00066-CR (Tex. App. -- Texarkana 2002, no pet.).

Applicant contends, among other things, that he was deprived of his right to appeal because trial counsel failed to file a timely notice of appeal due to the ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

After a review of the record, we find that Applicant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal in cause number 96-F-0343-202 from the 202nd Judicial District Court of Bowie County, Texas, because counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700, 703 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369, 373-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Applicant is ordered returned to that point in time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the sentences had been imposed on the date that the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to see that a written notice of appeal is given within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued. Applicant's remaining grounds for relief are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469, 472 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

DELIVERED: May 12, 2004

DO NOT PUBLISH

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Bonner, Ex Parte Virdis L., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonner-ex-parte-virdis-l-texcrimapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack