Bonnell v. Ward
238 F. 171, 151 C.C.A. 247, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1330
This text of 238 F. 171 (Bonnell v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bonnell v. Ward, 238 F. 171, 151 C.C.A. 247, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1330 (2d Cir. 1916).
Opinion
We concur in the opinion of the District Judge, except as to claim 6 of the patent to Bonnell, No. 921,584, for an outlet box for electric conduits. Assuming the patent to be valid, we think the claim should be narrowly construed, and that, so construed, the defendant’s structure does not infringe.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
238 F. 171, 151 C.C.A. 247, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonnell-v-ward-ca2-1916.