Home/Indiana Supreme Court/Bonnel v. Shirley

Bonnel v. Shirley

31 N.E. 64, 131 Ind. 362, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 192
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedApril 26, 1892
DocketNo. 15,647
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 31 N.E. 64 (Bonnel v. Shirley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonnel v. Shirley, 31 N.E. 64, 131 Ind. 362, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 192 (Ind. 1892).

Opinion

McBride, J.

The brief filed by counsel for the appellant contains nothing whatever by way of argument, or citation of authority. Nor is there even a suggestion of any reason, or ground, for holding the action of the court below erroneous.

We find nothing in it but a bare assertion of error. Such a brief presents no question for our consideration. Harrison v. Hedges, 60 Ind. 266; Bray v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 68 Ind. 6; Landwerlen v. Wheeler, 106 Ind. 523, and many other cases.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meno v. State
114 N.E. 689 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1917)
Eckman v. Funderburg
108 N.E. 577 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1915)
Sullivan v. Hoopengarner
96 N.E. 620 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
Guy v. Blue
45 N.E. 1052 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1897)
Chicago and Erie Railroad Co. v. Barnes
38 N.E. 428 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 N.E. 64, 131 Ind. 362, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonnel-v-shirley-ind-1892.