Bonkowski v. Allstate Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Bonkowski v. Allstate Insurance

764 N.W.2d 215, 483 Mich. 963, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 912

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 24, 2009

Docket137672

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 764 N.W.2d 215 (Bonkowski v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonkowski v. Allstate Insurance, 764 N.W.2d 215, 483 Mich. 963, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 912 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether 12 percent no-fault penalty interest under MCL 500.3142 ceases to accrue once the judgment is entered. The parties may file supplemental briefs, limited to that issue, within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether 12 percent no-fault penalty interest under MCL 500.3142 ceases to accrue once the judgment is entered. The parties may file supplemental briefs, limited to that issue, within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 N.W.2d 215, 483 Mich. 963, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonkowski-v-allstate-insurance-mich-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack