Bonkoski v. Village of Suffern
This text of 296 A.D.2d 404 (Bonkoski v. Village of Suffern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceed[405]*405ing pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Chief of Police, Suffern Police Department, dated April 3, 2001, which denied the petitioner’s application for line-of-duty benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated September 28, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant, a police officer, was injured while attempting to push a disabled police vehicle while on duty. He applied for benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c and the Chief of Police, Suffern Police Department, denied the application. The determination that the appellant did not sustain injuries in the performance of his duties was not arbitrary or capricious as the petitioner was not engaged in special work related to the nature of heightened risks and duties (see Balcerak v County of Nassau, 94 NY2d 253; Matter of Sutherland v Village of Suffern, 289 AD2d 582, lv denied 97 NY2d 613). Santucci, J.P., Altman, Florio and S. Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 A.D.2d 404, 744 N.Y.S.2d 506, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonkoski-v-village-of-suffern-nyappdiv-2002.