Bonine v. Gage

128 N.W. 240, 163 Mich. 288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bonine v. Gage. Read the opinion of the Court — 165 Mich. 420
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 11, 1910·No. Docket No. 64·Published

Opinion

Moore, J.

The original case was submitted at the June term. It involves the accounting of Mr. Gage as executor of the estate of Nelson Choate, deceased. Certain stock belonging to Mr. Choate came into the possession of Mr. Gage, who became a bankrupt and then resigned as executor. Mr. Gage kept this stock with his private papers in the vault of a bank where he was cashier. The bank failed, and Mr. Kimmerle was appointed trustee in bankruptcy, and took possession of the stock, and refused to give it up. It is sought to have Mr. Gage and his bondsmen pay for this stock upon the basis of what it might have been sold for, less its present value. The circuit judge found in favor of the administrator.

Since the case came into this court the circuit judge has sent in an informal return, to the effect that there is a mistake made in the record as to what his findings were. Mr. Gage, executor, has now filed a petition which states, in substance, that he has now been able to secure the stock, and to bring it into court for the administrator de bonis non, and asks leave to be allowed to do this, or to have the record remanded, with leave to do it in the lower •court.

I think an opportunity should be given to have the return of the judge corrected, and to have the record show the present status of the stock, so that a complete disposition of the controversy can be made.

Ostrander, Hooker, McAlvay, and Brooke, JJ., •concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonine v. Gage, 128 N.W. 240, 163 Mich. 288 (Mich. 1910).

128 N.W. 240 (Bonine v. Gage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.