Bonilla v. State

19 So. 3d 431, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14093, 2009 WL 3013490
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 2009·No. No. 3D07-2476·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Rejecting the appellant’s primary position on appeal, we conclude — notwithstanding the very sketchy nature of the record as to the surrounding circumstances — that the singular fact that the defendant drove a butcher knife five and three-quarter inches into the victim’s chest, reaching his heart and causing his death, was itself sufficient to establish the “depraved mind” element of second degree murder, of which Bonilla was convicted after a jury trial. See State v. Bryan, 287 So.2d 73 (Fla.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 912, 94 S.Ct. 2611, 41 L.Ed.2d 216 (1974); Todd v. State, 756 So.2d 145 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Hines v. State, 227 So.2d 334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969); Davis v. State, 317 Ark. 592, 879 S.W.2d 439 (1994); see also State v. Davidson, No. C.C.A. No. 88—231—III, 1989 WL 76326 (Tenn.Crim.App. Oct. 2, 1989).

We find no merit in the appellant’s contention that self-defense was established as a matter of law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonilla v. State, 19 So. 3d 431, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14093, 2009 WL 3013490 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

19 So. 3d 431 (Bonilla v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonilla v. State
87 So. 3d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)