Bonilla v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bonilla v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

229 A.D.2d 371, 644 N.Y.S.2d 655, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7580

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 229 A.D.2d 371 (Bonilla v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonilla v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 229 A.D.2d 371, 644 N.Y.S.2d 655, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated August 15, 1994, which denied their motion to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

By expressly stating they did not want to move for a mistrial in advance of the verdict, the plaintiffs waived their current objections to the comment in question (see, CPLR 4404 [a]; Mathews v Coca-Cola Bottling, 188 AD2d 590; Kamen v City of New York, 169 AD2d 705, 706). "Counsel may not be permitted to speculate upon whether a verdict will be favorable, before asserting a claim for a mistrial. Such a motion must be made in advance of the verdict” (Schein v Chest Serv. Co., 38 AD2d 929; see also, Virgo v Bonavilla, 49 NY2d 982). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated August 15, 1994, which denied their motion to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

By expressly stating they did not want to move for a mistrial in advance of the verdict, the plaintiffs waived their current objections to the comment in question (see, CPLR 4404 [a]; Mathews v Coca-Cola Bottling, 188 AD2d 590; Kamen v City of New York, 169 AD2d 705, 706). "Counsel may not be permitted to speculate upon whether a verdict will be favorable, before asserting a claim for a mistrial. Such a motion must be made in advance of the verdict” (Schein v Chest Serv. Co., 38 AD2d 929; see also, Virgo v Bonavilla, 49 NY2d 982). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D.2d 371, 644 N.Y.S.2d 655, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonilla-v-new-york-city-health-hospitals-corp-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack