Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods

871 N.W.2d 761, 2015 Minn. LEXIS 713, 2015 WL 7752493

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 25, 2015

DocketNo. A15-0233

StatusPublished

This text of 871 N.W.2d 761 (Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods, 871 N.W.2d 761, 2015 Minn. LEXIS 713, 2015 WL 7752493 (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on January 6, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI