Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods
871 N.W.2d 761, 2015 Minn. LEXIS 713, 2015 WL 7752493
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on January 6, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods, 871 N.W.2d 761, 2015 Minn. LEXIS 713, 2015 WL 7752493 (Mich. 2015).
871 N.W.2d 761 (Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)