Bonham Vs. State
This text of 485 P.3d 212 (Bonham Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BRYAN PHILLIP BONHAM, No. 82800 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA; THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF FILED CORR.ECTIONS; CHARLES DANIELS; TEM GARRETT; AND CARTER APR 2 9 2021 POTTER, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Res s ondents. BY.-5- DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for default and granting a motion for an extension of time. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; David M. Jones, Judge. No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for default and granting a motion for an extension of time. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing appealable determinations); Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Cadish
A , J. Pickering Herndon cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge Bryan Phillip Bonham Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COuRT OF NEVADA
2 .4 • s• • &•i 7,: 144‘0.• • fea
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 P.3d 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonham-vs-state-nev-2021.