Bonham v. Tipton

259 P. 509, 82 Colo. 316, 1927 Colo. LEXIS 450
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 19, 1927
DocketNo. 11,701.
StatusPublished

This text of 259 P. 509 (Bonham v. Tipton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonham v. Tipton, 259 P. 509, 82 Colo. 316, 1927 Colo. LEXIS 450 (Colo. 1927).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

Bonham sued Tipton for assault; there was a verdict for defendant and Bonham brings error.

The defendant testified that he committed the assault, and there was neither plea nor evidence of justification or excuse; the court should, therefore, have directed a verdict for plaintiff, and left to the jury the question of damages only.

It is objected that neither the motion for new trial nor the assignment of errors covers this point, but one ground in the motion is that the verdict is contrary to' the evidence, which, in this particular case, states the exact situation. See Leadville v. McDonald, 67 Colo. 131, 135, 186 Pac. 715, and the assignment sets it forth more definitely.

The judgment is reversed and the district court directed to submit only the amount of damages to a jury and render judgment for plaintiff for such sum as they may fix.

Mr. Chiep Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Whitpord and Mr. Justice Sheapor concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Leadville v. McDonald
67 Colo. 131 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 P. 509, 82 Colo. 316, 1927 Colo. LEXIS 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonham-v-tipton-colo-1927.