Bonham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bonham v. State

1912 OK CR 28, 121 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 703, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 355

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 3, 1912·No. No. A-1054.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Victor Bonham, plaintiff in error, was eonvieted in the county court of Coal county on an information which charged the offense of having possession of intoxicating liquor with the intention of selling the same. January 27, 1911, judgment was entered. When the ease was called on the assignment of this term the Attorney General moved in open court to affirm for failure to. prosecute. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error. The motion to affirm is therefore sustained and the cause remanded with direction to enforce the judgment therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Victor Bonham, plaintiff in error, was eonvieted in the county court of Coal county on an information which charged the offense of having possession of intoxicating liquor with the intention of selling the same. January 27, 1911, judgment was entered. When the ease was called on the assignment of this term the Attorney General moved in open court to affirm for failure to. prosecute. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error. The motion to affirm is therefore sustained and the cause remanded with direction to enforce the judgment therein.

Bonham v. State, 1912 OK CR 28, 121 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 703, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 355 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 28 (Bonham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.