Bonham v. State

1912 OK CR 28, 121 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 703, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 355
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 3, 1912
DocketNo. A-1054.
StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 28 (Bonham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonham v. State, 1912 OK CR 28, 121 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 703, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 355 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Victor Bonham, plaintiff in error, was eonvieted in the county court of Coal county on an information which charged the offense of having possession of intoxicating liquor with the intention of selling the same. January 27, 1911, judgment was entered. When the ease was called on the assignment of this term the Attorney General moved in open court to affirm for failure to. prosecute. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error. The motion to affirm is therefore sustained and the cause remanded with direction to enforce the judgment therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1912 OK CR 28, 121 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 703, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonham-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.