Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bonham v. State

Bonham v. State

450 So. 2d 269
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 1, 1984
Docket82-2432
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 450 So. 2d 269 (Bonham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonham v. State, 450 So. 2d 269 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

450 So.2d 269 (1984)

John BONHAM and Gerald Coucoulas, Appellants,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 82-2432.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 1, 1984.
Rehearing Denied June 5, 1984.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl, Miami, and Diane H. Tutt, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, Kurt Marmar, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Penny H. Brill and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendants' failure to object at trial to the admission of certain evidence which they had unsuccessfully moved to suppress before trial waives their right to claim on appeal that the evidence was erroneously admitted. Fraterrigo v. State, 151 Fla. 634, 10 So.2d 361 (1942); Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534 (1927); Rodriguez v. State, 433 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), and cases collected therein; Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We find no merit in, and certainly no support for, the defendants' contention that an exception to this well-settled rule exists where the pretrial motion to suppress is heard and decided immediately before the commencement of trial.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. State
711 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Dyson v. State
646 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Thomas v. State
599 So. 2d 158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cordero v. State
589 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
McKelton v. State
528 So. 2d 123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Johnson v. State
517 So. 2d 36 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Leon v. State
498 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Ridenour v. State
486 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
O'Brien v. State
479 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Braggs v. State
478 So. 2d 451 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Moe v. State
476 So. 2d 760 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
T.J. v. State
460 So. 2d 568 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Martinez v. State
457 So. 2d 1145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Snow v. Nelson
450 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
450 So. 2d 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonham-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.