Bonfire Restaurant v. Randum

182 So. 2d 10
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 5, 1966·No. No. 34292·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This'cause having heretofore been sub-, mitted to the Court on petition for writ of certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date March 19, 1965, and the petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.

It is further ordered that the respondent’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees be and the same is hereby granted and a fee of $350.00 is hereby allowed.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonfire Restaurant v. Randum, 182 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 1966).

182 So. 2d 10 (Bonfire Restaurant v. Randum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Porter
182 B.R. 53 (M.D. Florida, 1994)
Carawan v. State
515 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
In Re Estate of Williams
182 So. 2d 10 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)