Boney v. Laurens Hardware Co.
121 S.E. 120, 157 Ga. 213, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 18
This text of 121 S.E. 120 (Boney v. Laurens Hardware Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boney v. Laurens Hardware Co., 121 S.E. 120, 157 Ga. 213, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 18 (Ga. 1924).
Opinion
The evidence in the case was sufficient to support the verdict. The ground of the motion for new trial complaining of the admission of evidence does not show what, if any, objection was urged to the evidence at the time it was offered. The other assignments of error are without merit. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 S.E. 120, 157 Ga. 213, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boney-v-laurens-hardware-co-ga-1924.