Boney v. Collins
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40897 (Summary Calendar) __________________
LARRY D. BONEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JAMES A. COLLINS, WAYNE SCOTT, LESLIE WOODS,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. CA-C-95-28) - - - - - - - - - - April 2, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges. * PER CURIAM
Larry D. Boney appeals the dismissal of his civil rights suit
as frivolous. Boney argues that he has been subject to numerous
lockdowns without cause and in violation of a previous remedial
court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. district court. See Boney v. Collins, No. CA-C-95-28 (S.D. Tex.
Oct. 12, 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boney v. Collins (Boney v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.