Boney v. Collins

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 23, 1996·No. 95-40897·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40897 (Summary Calendar) __________________

LARRY D. BONEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, WAYNE SCOTT, LESLIE WOODS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. CA-C-95-28) - - - - - - - - - - April 2, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges. * PER CURIAM

Larry D. Boney appeals the dismissal of his civil rights suit

as frivolous. Boney argues that he has been subject to numerous

lockdowns without cause and in violation of a previous remedial

court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. district court. See Boney v. Collins, No. CA-C-95-28 (S.D. Tex.

Oct. 12, 1995).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boney v. Collins, (5th Cir. 1996).

Boney v. Collins (Boney v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.