Bonettis v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bonettis v. Goord

267 A.D.2d 959, 700 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13659

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 959 (Bonettis v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonettis v. Goord, 267 A.D.2d 959, 700 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The misbehavior report constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner violated various inmate rules (see, Matter of Bryant v Coughlin, 77 NY2d 642, 647; People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139). The contention of petitioner that he was not given an order to leave his cell presented an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Hawkins v Coombe, 225 AD2d 1095, 1096). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The misbehavior report constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner violated various inmate rules (see, Matter of Bryant v Coughlin, 77 NY2d 642, 647; People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139). The contention of petitioner that he was not given an order to leave his cell presented an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Hawkins v Coombe, 225 AD2d 1095, 1096). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 959, 700 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonettis-v-goord-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack