Bones v. State

764 So. 2d 888, 2000 WL 1140487
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 2000·No. 4D99-1590·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

764 So.2d 888 (2000)

Lucille BONES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D99-1590.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 9, 2000.

Steve M. Glerum of Steve M. Glerum, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John Barker, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant's conviction and sentence upon a violation of probation notwithstanding a jury's acquittal of Appellant on the offense constituting the violation. Acquittal on the substantive offense is not a collateral estoppel bar to revocation of probation on the same offense. See Russ v. State, 313 So.2d 758 (Fla.1975); White v. State, 332 So.2d 350 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). We remand, however, for entry of a written order identifying the commission of the crime as the only ground for the violation.

STONE, KLEIN, and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bones v. State, 764 So. 2d 888, 2000 WL 1140487 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

764 So. 2d 888 (Bones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
6 So. 3d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Bond v. State
839 So. 2d 853 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
State v. Roesle
799 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)