Bonert v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bonert v. White

30 A.D.2d 553, 291 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4031

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 553 (Bonert v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonert v. White, 30 A.D.2d 553, 291 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by Dakis Marine Service, Inc. (assignee of plaintiEs-respondents): (1) insofar as it is to adjudge appellants in contempt of court denied, without prejudice to renewal of such motion at Special Term; and (2) insofar as it is to amend this court’s order dated July 14, 1958, as amended on December 22, 1958 (erroneously referred to in ithe moving papers as dated February 11, 1959 [the date of entry of judgment in the office of the Clerk of the County of Nassau upon said order]) denied. (Said determination of this court was affirmed by the Court of Appeals in 1961 [Bonert v. White, 9 N Y 2d 956].) Under the circumstances presented, the mandate of the Court of Appeals precludes .the present application to amend the order (Murray Oil Prods. Co. v. Royal Exeh. Assur. Co., 29 A D 2d 935; Litchfield Constr. Co. v. City of New York, 219 App. Div. 369). Moreover, in our opinion, said application should be denied for laches (Gall v. Gall, 58 App. Div. 97). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by Dakis Marine Service, Inc. (assignee of plaintiEs-respondents): (1) insofar as it is to adjudge appellants in contempt of court denied, without prejudice to renewal of such motion at Special Term; and (2) insofar as it is to amend this court’s order dated July 14, 1958, as amended on December 22, 1958 (erroneously referred to in ithe moving papers as dated February 11, 1959 [the date of entry of judgment in the office of the Clerk of the County of Nassau upon said order]) denied. (Said determination of this court was affirmed by the Court of Appeals in 1961 [Bonert v. White, 9 N Y 2d 956].) Under the circumstances presented, the mandate of the Court of Appeals precludes .the present application to amend the order (Murray Oil Prods. Co. v. Royal Exeh. Assur. Co., 29 A D 2d 935; Litchfield Constr. Co. v. City of New York, 219 App. Div. 369). Moreover, in our opinion, said application should be denied for laches (Gall v. Gall, 58 App. Div. 97). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 553, 291 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonert-v-white-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack