Boneless Fish Co. v. Roberts

12 F. 627, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2556
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJune 17, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 F. 627 (Boneless Fish Co. v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boneless Fish Co. v. Roberts, 12 F. 627, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2556 (circtsdny 1882).

Opinion

Wallace, C. J.

In view of what was well known at the time of Atwood’s invention, his patent is to be construed as limited to a process of curing fish in which the membrane or tissue between the flesh and the skin is removed during the process, and before the article is in a condition to be packed and boxed for the market.

The defendants buy the article fully cured, and even if they remove the membrane with the outer skin, they only do what any one has a right to do in preparing the article for cooking. Tho circumstance that this is done in order to make the article more marketable, does not alter the character of the act.

The bill is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Strawboard Co. v. Elkhart Egg-Case Co.
84 F. 960 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 F. 627, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boneless-fish-co-v-roberts-circtsdny-1882.