Bonebrake v. Arnreiter-Franklin, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Bonebrake v. Arnreiter-Franklin, Inc.

704 P.2d 1156, 75 Or. App. 34

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 14, 1985

DocketA8112-07940; CA A32254

StatusPublished

This text of 704 P.2d 1156 (Bonebrake v. Arnreiter-Franklin, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonebrake v. Arnreiter-Franklin, Inc., 704 P.2d 1156, 75 Or. App. 34 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in accordance with an order granting plaintiff summary judgment in an action to collect certain debts. The document, which the trial court styled its “final judgment,” disposes of plaintiffs second, third and fourth claims for relief only. It does not dispose of plaintiffs first claim, which requests a judgment of $89,000, plus interest, “[a]gainst defendants Arnreiter-Franklin, Incorporated and Theodor P. Franklin, and each of them * * *.” Neither does it contain “an express determination that there is no just reason for delay * * *.” ORCP 67B. We dismiss the appeal for lack of an appealable judgment. ORS 19.010(2)(e). Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Van Dyke, 285 Or 375, 591 P2d 352 (1979).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in accordance with an order granting plaintiff summary judgment in an action to collect certain debts. The document, which the trial court styled its “final judgment,” disposes of plaintiffs second, third and fourth claims for relief only. It does not dispose of plaintiffs first claim, which requests a judgment of $89,000, plus interest, “[a]gainst defendants Arnreiter-Franklin, Incorporated and Theodor P. Franklin, and each of them * * *.” Neither does it contain “an express determination that there is no just reason for delay * * *.” ORCP 67B. We dismiss the appeal for lack of an appealable judgment. ORS 19.010(2)(e). Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Van Dyke, 285 Or 375, 591 P2d 352 (1979).

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

704 P.2d 1156, 75 Or. App. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonebrake-v-arnreiter-franklin-inc-orctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack