Bone v. Bone
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Roger Bone appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage to Sheila Bone. Roger Bone contends the trial court erred (1) in its division of marital property, and (2) in imputing income to him in calculating child support.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The division of property was fair and equitable under the circumstances of the case. Hart v. Hart, 210 S.W.3d 480, 485 (Mo.App. W.D.2007). Further, the trial court’s child support is support by substantial evidence and the trial court did not abuse its discre *68 tion. Franklin v. Franklin, 213 S.W.3d 218, 223 (Mo.App. E.D.2007). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
248 S.W.3d 67 (Bone v. Bone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.