Bondurant v. Geeker
This text of 515 So. 2d 214 (Bondurant v. Geeker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We accepted jurisdiction to review Bon-durant v. Geeker, 499 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), based on apparent conflict with Public Health Trust v. Knuck, 495 So.2d 834 (Fla.3d DCA 1986), and Brogan v. Mullins, 452 So.2d 940 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). Upon closer examination, we find no express and direct conflict of decisions as is required by article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 So. 2d 214, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 580, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bondurant-v-geeker-fla-1987.