Bondurant v. Geeker

515 So. 2d 214, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 580, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2480
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 12, 1987·No. No. 70090·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review Bon-durant v. Geeker, 499 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), based on apparent conflict with Public Health Trust v. Knuck, 495 So.2d 834 (Fla.3d DCA 1986), and Brogan v. Mullins, 452 So.2d 940 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). Upon closer examination, we find no express and direct conflict of decisions as is required by article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARRETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bondurant v. Geeker, 515 So. 2d 214, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 580, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2480 (Fla. 1987).

515 So. 2d 214 (Bondurant v. Geeker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mathis v. State
515 So. 2d 214 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)