Bonds v. State

430 S.W.3d 337, 2014 WL 1848457, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 519
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 6, 2014·No. No. ED 99509·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl Bonds appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 [338] motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Johnson v. State, 406 S.W.3d 892, 898 (Mo. banc 2013). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). PER CURIAM.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonds v. State, 430 S.W.3d 337, 2014 WL 1848457, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 519 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

430 S.W.3d 337 (Bonds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
406 S.W.3d 892 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2013)