Bonded Rental Agency, Inc. v. City of Miami

192 So. 2d 305, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4624
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 1966·No. No. 66-370·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

A property owner sued the appellee City, to determine whether or not lie 'was operating a business within the purview of a licensing ordinance and to enjoin the City’s attempts to enforce said ordinance. The complaint alleged that a rental collection agency, appellant, was operating and managing the property.

Upon motion by the City, the chancellor entered an order joining the appellant as a party defendant. The appellant instituted this interlocutory appeal and assigns as error the entry of said order.

The joinder of parties in equity is largely a matter of discretion. Milton v. City of Marianna, 107 Fla. 251, 144 So. 400, 402 (1932). No abuse of discretion has been shown.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonded Rental Agency, Inc. v. City of Miami, 192 So. 2d 305, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4624 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

192 So. 2d 305 (Bonded Rental Agency, Inc. v. City of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Land & Leisure, Inc. v. Valdez
389 So. 2d 1093 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)