Bond v. Walters

Supreme Court

Bond v. Walters

254 U.S. 612, 41 S. Ct. 62, 65 L. Ed. 438, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1132

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 15, 1920

DocketNo. 83

StatusPublished

This text of 254 U.S. 612 (Bond v. Walters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bond v. Walters, 254 U.S. 612, 41 S. Ct. 62, 65 L. Ed. 438, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1132 (1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Error to the Court of Appeals for the First Appellate District, Division One, State of California. Submitted November 8, 1920. Decided November 15, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726. Mr. DanielN. Clark and Mr. Harry A. Hegarty for plaintiff in error. Mr. John W. Preston and Mr. John C. Brooke for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the Court of Appeals for the First Appellate District, Division One, State of California. Submitted November 8, 1920. Decided November 15, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726. Mr. DanielN. Clark and Mr. Harry A. Hegarty for plaintiff in error. Mr. John W. Preston and Mr. John C. Brooke for defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 U.S. 612, 41 S. Ct. 62, 65 L. Ed. 438, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bond-v-walters-scotus-1920.