Bond v. United States Attorney

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1320

WILLIAM C. BOND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, District of Maryland, Northern Division; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, for the District of Maryland,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-01188-WDQ)

Submitted: August 28, 2008 Decided: September 12, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William C. Bond, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William C. Bond appeals from the district court’s orders

dismissing his action seeking relief under the Freedom of

Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 2007 & Supp. 2008). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.*

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Bond v. United States Attorney, No. 1:07-cv-01188-WDQ

(D. Md. May 17 & Nov. 20, 2007). Additionally, we deny all of

Bond’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bond also appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration, motion to recuse, and motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Upon review of the record, we find the district court did not err in denying Bond’s motions.