Bond v. . Turner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Bond v. . Turner

4 N.C. 690

DecidedJanuary 5, 1818

StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.C. 690 (Bond v. . Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bond v. . Turner, 4 N.C. 690 (N.C. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

The court has the power of allowing 5 per cent commissions on the receipts and 5 per cent on the disbursements. The court has a discretionary power to allow less, but not more than 5 per cent.

The defendant, in this case, should not be allowed commissions on his own debt. The exception to the report for that reason must be allowed, and the judge will use his discretion upon the other point. (691)

NOTE. — See McAuslan v. Green, 1 N.C. 260; Hodges v. Armstrong,14 N.C. 253; Walton v. Avery, 22 N.C. 405; see, also, this case, though not so fully reported, in 6 N.C. 331.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court has the power of allowing 5 per cent commissions on the receipts and 5 per cent on the disbursements. The court has a discretionary power to allow less, but not more than 5 per cent.

The defendant, in this case, should not be allowed commissions on his own debt. The exception to the report for that reason must be allowed, and the judge will use his discretion upon the other point. (691)

NOTE. — See McAuslan v. Green, 1 N.C. 260; Hodges v. Armstrong,14 N.C. 253; Walton v. Avery, 22 N.C. 405; see, also, this case, though not so fully reported, in 6 N.C. 331.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 N.C. 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bond-v-turner-nc-1818.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack