Bond v. Superior Court
This text of 174 Cal. 376 (Bond v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the conclusion of the oral argument, the following opinion was rendered:
The court is of the opinion that the case is not distinguishable from Huerstal v. Muir, 62 Cal. 479, that the amendment to section 1210 of the Code of Civil Procedure has not changed the law in the respect suggested, and does not grant or confer any right of appeal in such a matter, that under these circumstances Huerstal v. Muir, 62 Cal. 479, controls, and the portion of the order complained of in this proceeding should be annulled.
It is so ordered.
Sloss, J., Melvin, J., and Lawlor, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 Cal. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bond-v-superior-court-cal-1917.