Bond v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bond v. State

642 So. 2d 674, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9156, 1994 WL 515732

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 23, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1432

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 642 So. 2d 674 (Bond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bond v. State, 642 So. 2d 674, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9156, 1994 WL 515732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

Appellant Carl Bond was convicted of two counts of committing a lewd and lascivious act in the presence of a child, as a result of masturbating in the presence of two girls under 16 years of age. An Anders1 brief was filed, but after carefully reviewing the record as required by State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987), supplemental briefs were ordered.

In State v. Hernandez, 596 So.2d 671 (Fla. 1992), the Florida Supreme Court held that it is the number of distinct lewd acts committed which determines the number of allowable convictions for committing a lewd act in the presence of a child, not the size of the audience or the number of witnesses. See also Roberts v. State, 620 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Since the evidence in this case established only one lewd act, one of the convictions must be reversed. Although only one of the girls testified that appellant was aware of their presence and knowingly continued to masturbate, the evidence is legally sufficient to support appellant’s conviction for knowingly committing a lewd or lascivious act in the presence of a child under 16 years of age. In light of the reversal of one conviction, the case is remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the sentence imposed.

The conviction and sentence as to count one is reversed with directions that appellant be discharged as to that charge. The conviction as to count two is affirmed and the case remanded for reconsideration of the sentence imposed therefor.

REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED.

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COBB, Judge.

Appellant Carl Bond was convicted of two counts of committing a lewd and lascivious act in the presence of a child, as a result of masturbating in the presence of two girls under 16 years of age. An Anders1 brief was filed, but after carefully reviewing the record as required by State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987), supplemental briefs were ordered.

In State v. Hernandez, 596 So.2d 671 (Fla. 1992), the Florida Supreme Court held that it is the number of distinct lewd acts committed which determines the number of allowable convictions for committing a lewd act in the presence of a child, not the size of the audience or the number of witnesses. See also Roberts v. State, 620 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Since the evidence in this case established only one lewd act, one of the convictions must be reversed. Although only one of the girls testified that appellant was aware of their presence and knowingly continued to masturbate, the evidence is legally sufficient to support appellant’s conviction for knowingly committing a lewd or lascivious act in the presence of a child under 16 years of age. In light of the reversal of one conviction, the case is remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the sentence imposed.

The conviction and sentence as to count one is reversed with directions that appellant be discharged as to that charge. The conviction as to count two is affirmed and the case remanded for reconsideration of the sentence imposed therefor.

REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED.

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

642 So. 2d 674, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9156, 1994 WL 515732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bond-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack