Bond v. Lowenstein

162 A. 544, 111 N.J. Eq. 442, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 748
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 17, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 A. 544 (Bond v. Lowenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bond v. Lowenstein, 162 A. 544, 111 N.J. Eq. 442, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 748 (N.J. 1932).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Yiee-Chaneellor Fallon.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webb v. Consolidated Oil Co.
100 F.2d 865 (Fifth Circuit, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 A. 544, 111 N.J. Eq. 442, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bond-v-lowenstein-nj-1932.