Bond v. Lowenstein

162 A. 544, 111 N.J. Eq. 442, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 748
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 17, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Yiee-Chaneellor Fallon.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bond v. Lowenstein, 162 A. 544, 111 N.J. Eq. 442, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 748 (N.J. 1932).

162 A. 544 (Bond v. Lowenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webb v. Consolidated Oil Co.
100 F.2d 865 (Fifth Circuit, 1939)