Bond v. Fay

83 Mass. 212
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 Mass. 212 (Bond v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bond v. Fay, 83 Mass. 212 (Mass. 1861).

Opinion

Bigelow, C. J.

This is not, strictly speaking, a civil action in which the party in whose favor an award is made can claim costs as a matter of right under Rev. Sts. c. 121, § 1, on the ground that he is the prevailing party. Under a submission, entered into before a magistrate according to the provisions of our statute, (Rev. Sts. c. 114,) neither party can be said to be the plaintiff or defendant. It is true that each stands in that relation towards the other so far as their respective claims and demands -are submitted to the determination of the arbitrators. But the proceeding derives all its force and effect from the mutual assent of the parties, and in this respect essentially differs from an action at law or in equity in which one party compels the other to appear and litigate his rights. It is therefore a “ civil proceeding,” rather than a “ civil action,” and as such comes within the provisions of Rev. Sts. c. 121, § 20, by which the subject of costs, in such cases, is wholly within the discretion of the court. To the exercise of this discretion by the court in which the proceeding is pending no exception lies,

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bordeaux v. Meier
1981 Mass. App. Div. 189 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 Mass. 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bond-v-fay-mass-1861.