Bond v. Edenwald-German General Aged Home of Baltimore

680 F. App'x 261
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2017
DocketNo. 16-2308
StatusPublished

This text of 680 F. App'x 261 (Bond v. Edenwald-German General Aged Home of Baltimore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bond v. Edenwald-German General Aged Home of Baltimore, 680 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tina Bond appeals the district court’s order granting Edenwald-German General Aged Home of Baltimore summary judgment on Bond’s claims, which were brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2016). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Bond v. Edenwald-German Gen. Aged Home of Baltimore, No. 1:15-cv-02513-JFM, 2016 WL 6069490 (D. Md. Oct. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
680 F. App'x 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bond-v-edenwald-german-general-aged-home-of-baltimore-ca4-2017.