Bond v. Cooper
This text of 759 N.W.2d 360 (Bond v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lititia BOND, Personal Representative of the Estate of Norma Jean Blocker, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Intervening Plaintiff,
v.
Adam COOPER, M.D., Kristen McDaniel, D.O., and Botsford General Hospital, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the sufficiency of the plaintiff's notice of intent to file suit under MCL 600.2912b(4) and Boodt v. Borgess Medical Center, 481 Mich. 558, 751 N.W.2d 44 (2008).
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and WEAVER, JJ, are not persuaded that the case should be remanded for further proceedings, but they would grant leave to appeal to reconsider Boodt, supra.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
759 N.W.2d 360, 482 Mich. 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bond-v-cooper-mich-2008.