Bond v. Broderick

232 A.D. 468, 250 N.Y.S. 343, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13849
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 29, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 232 A.D. 468 (Bond v. Broderick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bond v. Broderick, 232 A.D. 468, 250 N.Y.S. 343, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, the committee of an incompetent, deposited funds in The Bank of United States, an authorized depositary for trust funds. This bank is now being liquidated by the Superintendent of Banks under the provisions of the Banking Law. The petitioner has been granted a peremptory mandamus order directing the Superintendent to turn over the balance on deposit in his account. No authority exists for the granting of this relief.

The Banking Law (§ 188, subd. 8) gives a preference over general depositors to guardians, committees, trustees and others who make deposits under court orders in banks authorized to act as depositaries for such funds. These deposits are not to be considered as bailments of specific money. There is nothing in the Banking Law to indicate that the relation between such depositors and the bank is to be regarded as other than the usual debtor and creditor relationship. The Banking Law also provides (§§ 72 to 78,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bridge v. First Nat. Bank-Detroit
5 F. Supp. 442 (E.D. Michigan, 1933)
In re De Wind
144 Misc. 665 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)
In re Societa Principessa Iolanda Margherita Di Savoia
235 A.D. 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 468, 250 N.Y.S. 343, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bond-v-broderick-nyappdiv-1931.