BONCHANSKY v. Jordan

Missouri Court of Appeals

BONCHANSKY v. Jordan

251 S.W.3d 402, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2008 WL 1944628

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 6, 2008

DocketWD 68253

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 S.W.3d 402 (BONCHANSKY v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

BONCHANSKY v. Jordan, 251 S.W.3d 402, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2008 WL 1944628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Bonchansky appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of Frances Jordan and BDM Associates, LLC (“BDM”), on his petition alleging negligence against them and seeking damages for injuries he suffered while on their property.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding *403 of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Bonchansky appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of Frances Jordan and BDM Associates, LLC (“BDM”), on his petition alleging negligence against them and seeking damages for injuries he suffered while on their property.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding *403 of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 S.W.3d 402, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2008 WL 1944628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonchansky-v-jordan-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack