Boncella v. Camden Central School District

115 A.D.2d 324, 496 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54605

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: None of the writings relied upon by the plaintiff was sufficient to constitute a valid notice of claim, and several of them were not served, as required by statute, upon the "governing body” (Education Law § 3813 [1]; Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ., 60 NY2d 539; P. J. Panzeca, Inc. v Board of Educ., 29 NY2d 508, 509, [325] rearg dismissed 29 NY2d 749). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Murphy, J. — late notice of claim.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boncella v. Camden Central School District, 115 A.D.2d 324, 496 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

115 A.D.2d 324 (Boncella v. Camden Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

P. J. Panzeca, Inc. v. Board of Education
272 N.E.2d 488 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of Education
458 N.E.2d 1241 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)