Bonarrigo v. Hodgkins

2009 Mass. App. Div. 17, 2009 Mass. App. Div. LEXIS 17
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division·Decided February 3, 2009·Published

Opinion

Hand, J.

This case arises out of a soured business relationship between plaintiff-appellant Stephen Bonarrigo (“Bonarrigo”), the owner of a 27-foot power boat, and defendant-appellee Rick Hodgkins (“Hodgkins”), the operator of Rick’s Outboard Marine, Inc. (“Rick’s Marine”). Rick’s Marine is a business specializing in the maintenance and repair of boats and their engines. As set out in more detail below, Hodgkins and Rick’s Marine performed work on Bonarrigo’s boat under the terms of an agreement defined by the parties’ course of conduct over a matter of years. When Bonarrigo had a problem with the boat, he called Rick’s Marine; Rick’s Marine would do the repair work and bill Bonarrigo for those services. Although this arrangement appears to have worked smoothly for some time, a dispute arose in 2005 when Bonarrigo refused to pay for certain work done for him by Rick’s Marine. In response to Bonarrigo’s refusal to pay, Hodgkins arranged to have Bonarrigo’s boat hauled from the water and transported to a locked storage lot at Rick’s Marine. Hodgkins declined to return the boat to Bonarrigo until Bonarrigo paid the outstanding repair invoices. As a result of this impasse, in 2005, Bonarrigo sued Hodgkins for conversion. Hodgkins counterclaimed against Bonarrigo for claims including breach of contract, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment. After a jury-waived trial, the trial judge found in favor of Hodgkins and Rick’s Marine2 on [18] Bonarrigo’s claim. The judge likewise found for Hodgkins and Rick’s Marine on Hodgkins’s counterclaim for breach of contract, and awarded damages on that claim.3 Because we find that Hodgkins had, and continues to have, a valid lien on Bonarrigo’s boat, we uphold the trial court’s findings and award.

The record reflects that at all times relevant to this action, Rick’s Marine was located on Pope’s Island between the adjacent coastal communities of New Bedford and Fall River. Bonarrigo kept his 27-foot Carver Sedan Bridge at a marina across the road from Rick’s Marine. As part of their usual course of dealing, the parties frequently transported the boat back and forth between Rick’s Marine and the marina.

The seeds of this dispute were sown over the 2005 winter storage period. During that time, Rick’s Marine performed substantial repairs on Bonarrigo’s boat.4 Shortly after launching the boat, and before leaving the dock for the first time after the completion of these repairs, Bonarrigo discovered that the boat was taking on water. Although the reason for that water leakage was disputed at trial,5 it is agreed that the leakage made it necessary to remove the boat from the marina. After speaking with Rick’s Marine about the problem, Bonarrigo pulled the boat out of the water and dropped it off, after hours, at Rick’s Marine for repair.

Rick’s Marine made the necessary repairs to the boat, advised Bonarrigo that the work was finished, and sent him an invoice for the cost of the repairs.6 Once again, Bonarrigo picked up the boat after hours and launched it himself. After fueling up, Bonarrigo started out of the marina. Before he could get past the confines of the yacht club, however, Bonarrigo and his passengers heard a “knocking” sound in the engines, and had to return to the dock. Bonarrigo called Rick’s Marine. The boat was pulled from the water and towed to Rick’s Marine. On [19] inspection there, Hodgkins determined that the boat’s port engine was “blown” — in other words, catastrophically damaged — and needed to be replaced. After discussing the necessary repairs with Bonarrigo, Rick’s Marine replaced the damaged machinery with a reconditioned engine, and performed some other work on the boat as well.7 Rick’s Marine billed Bonarrigo for the cost of this work; Bonarrigo did not pay the invoice.

When the work was finished, Rick’s Marine arranged to have the boat returned to the marina and launched. The record does not show that Bonarrigo took the boat out of the confines of the marina after this launch. After the boat was back in the water, Hodgkins called Bonarrigo to follow up on Bonarrigo’s failure to pay Rick’s Marine’s bills for the repair work. When Bonarrigo flatly refused responsibility for payment of the invoices, Hodgkins had a Rick’s Marine employee pull the boat out of the water and bring it to Rick’s Marine. The boat was kept in Rick’s Marine’s fenced lot. When Bonarrigo demanded that Rick’s Marine return the boat, Hodgkins told him that the boat would be returned when Bonarrigo paid his repair bills. Bonarrigo never paid the bills. The boat has been stored in the lot at Rick’s Marine since 2005, and has accrued storage fees since that time.

Bonarrigo filed suit against Hodgkins in November, 2005; Hodgkins answered and counterclaimed in August, 2006; and the matter was tried jury waived on October 16, 2007. The trial judge found in favor of Hodgkins on both Bonarrigo’s claim and on Hodgkins’s counterclaim, and awarded to Hodgkins and Rick’s Marine damages of $7,655.89 for repairs and $378.00 for storage, plus interest and costs. Bonarrigo appeals from that judgment.

As the trial court correctly observed, Hodgkins’s liability for conversion turns on whether Rick’s Marine had a valid lien on the boat at the time that Hodgkins arranged to have the boat towed into Rick’s Marine lot. We find that it did.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonarrigo v. Hodgkins, 2009 Mass. App. Div. 17, 2009 Mass. App. Div. LEXIS 17 (Mass. Ct. App. 2009).

2009 Mass. App. Div. 17 (Bonarrigo v. Hodgkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LiDonni, Inc. v. Hart
246 N.E.2d 446 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1969)
Goulet v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.
506 N.E.2d 95 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1987)
Berman v. Linnane
434 Mass. 301 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2001)
Popponesset Beach Ass'n v. Marchillo
658 N.E.2d 983 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1996)