Bonanno v. Virginia Land & Improvement Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Bonanno v. Virginia Land & Improvement Corp.

599 F. App'x 524

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 27, 2015

DocketNo. 14-2404

StatusPublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 524 (Bonanno v. Virginia Land & Improvement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonanno v. Virginia Land & Improvement Corp., 599 F. App'x 524 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Louis Bonanno, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying Bonanno’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) post-judgment motions to reconsider the court’s prior order dismissing his civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bonanno’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Bonanno has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Louis Bonanno, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying Bonanno’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) post-judgment motions to reconsider the court’s prior order dismissing his civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bonanno’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Bonanno has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

599 F. App'x 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonanno-v-virginia-land-improvement-corp-ca4-2015.