BONAFIDE MASONRY, Retailfirst etc. v. Russell R. Saxton

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 2015
Docket14-4833
StatusPublished

This text of BONAFIDE MASONRY, Retailfirst etc. v. Russell R. Saxton (BONAFIDE MASONRY, Retailfirst etc. v. Russell R. Saxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BONAFIDE MASONRY, Retailfirst etc. v. Russell R. Saxton, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

BONAFIDE MASONRY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO RETAILFIRST INSURANCE FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND COMPANY AND CLAIMS DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CENTER SUMMIT, CASE NO. 1D14-4833 Appellants,

v.

RUSSELL R. SAXTON,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 5, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Ellen H. Lorenzen, Judge.

Date of Accident: February 10, 1988.

Mark S. Spangler of the Law Offices of Mark S. Spangler, P.A., Maitland, for Appellants.

Michael J. Winer of the Law Office of Michael J. Winer, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal of two nonfinal orders rendered by the Judge of

Compensation Claims on September 3, 2014, and September 23, 2014, respectively. Appellants challenge the nonfinal orders under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.180(b)(1)(A), which provides for appellate review of a nonfinal order adjudicating

jurisdiction. Appellants, however, have failed to demonstrate that the September 23,

2014, order denying its motion to dismiss “adjudicates” jurisdiction, as the term is

used in Rule 9.180(b)(1)(A). In the order, the JCC specifically declined to rule on

the jurisdictional question raised in Appellants’ motion, based on a lack of evidence.

The JCC advised Appellants to file an evidentiary motion supporting its allegations,

and rather than doing so, Appellants filed this premature appeal. Appellant also

failed to file a timely notice of appeal from the rendition of the September 3, 2014,

order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BONAFIDE MASONRY, Retailfirst etc. v. Russell R. Saxton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonafide-masonry-retailfirst-etc-v-russell-r-saxto-fladistctapp-2015.