Bonachea v. Westchester Park County Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bonachea v. Westchester Park County Commission

243 A.D. 789, 278 N.Y.S. 202

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs [790] and disbursements, on the authority of MacMullen v. City of Middletown (187 N. Y. 37); Rogers v. Village of Port Chester (234 id. 182, 187); Matter of Passero & Sons, Inc. (237 App. Div. 638), and Ponsrok v. City of Yonkers (254 N. Y. 91). We disregard the question of practice for it would be an idle ceremony to reverse on the ground of technical error in procedure, when the defendants, by answering, will reach the same result by moving for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Buies of Civil Practice. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs [790] and disbursements, on the authority of MacMullen v. City of Middletown (187 N. Y. 37); Rogers v. Village of Port Chester (234 id. 182, 187); Matter of Passero & Sons, Inc. (237 App. Div. 638), and Ponsrok v. City of Yonkers (254 N. Y. 91). We disregard the question of practice for it would be an idle ceremony to reverse on the ground of technical error in procedure, when the defendants, by answering, will reach the same result by moving for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Buies of Civil Practice. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Bonachea v. Westchester Park County Commission, 243 A.D. 789, 278 N.Y.S. 202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 789 (Bonachea v. Westchester Park County Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related