Bon Secours Health System v. Bonanno

109 So. 3d 1241, 2013 WL 1245313, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5079
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 2013
DocketNo. 1D12-4268
StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 3d 1241 (Bon Secours Health System v. Bonanno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bon Secours Health System v. Bonanno, 109 So. 3d 1241, 2013 WL 1245313, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5079 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the Employer/Carrier (E/C) challenges an order entered by the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) that awards Claimant permanent total disability supplemental benefits and E/C-paid penalties and interest based on the untimely payment of said benefits. We affirm the JCC’s award of permanent total disability supplemental benefits and interest without further comment, but we reverse and remand on the issue of the imposition of E/C-paid penalties.

Under the applicable statutory authority, the payment of penalties is excused where nonpayment results from “conditions over which the E/C had no control.” See § 440.20(6), Fla. Stat. (2008); see also Jones v. City of St. Petersburg, 46 So.3d 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (holding penalties should have been excused where untimely payment of supplemental permanent total disability benefits resulted from conditions over which the E/C had no control). Although the JCC found the payment of Claimant’s permanent total disability supplemental benefits was untimely, the JCC made no findings as to whether the untimely payment resulted from conditions over which the E/C had no control. Because it is not clear why the JCC imposed penalties in this case, and further, because the facts of this case could conceivably permit a finding of excusable delay under the law, the lack of factual findings supporting the imposition of penalties against the E/C is not harmless error.

Accordingly, the award of permanent total disability supplemental benefits, and interest on those late payments, is AFFIRMED, and the award of E/C-paid penalties on the benefits at issue is REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

LEWIS and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. City of St. Petersburg
46 So. 3d 637 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 So. 3d 1241, 2013 WL 1245313, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bon-secours-health-system-v-bonanno-fladistctapp-2013.