Bommer v. County of Erie

600 N.E.2d 213, 80 N.Y.2d 816, 587 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1541
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 11, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 600 N.E.2d 213 (Bommer v. County of Erie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bommer v. County of Erie, 600 N.E.2d 213, 80 N.Y.2d 816, 587 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1541 (N.Y. 1992).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

At trial, plaintiff offered no proof that Erie County’s failure to install the sign in concrete caused the sign to fall or proximately caused his injuries. Viewing the proof adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the plaintiff and giving the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference, we conclude [818]*818that no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences could possibly lead rational jurors to conclude that Erie County’s failure to install the sign in concrete caused plaintiffs injuries (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499). Accordingly, the Appellate Division correctly granted defendant’s motion to set aside the jury verdict.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), orders affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Education v. Christa Construction, Inc.
608 N.E.2d 756 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
600 N.E.2d 213, 80 N.Y.2d 816, 587 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bommer-v-county-of-erie-ny-1992.