Bomboy v. State

23 A.D.2d 713, 258 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4695
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bomboy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 A.D.2d 974
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1965·No. Claim No. 40528; Claim No. 40529·Published

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. The appli[714] cation, was denied upon the evident misapprehension that it was made more than one year after service of a copy of the order of dismissal (CP'LR 5015, subd. [a], par. 1), the order having been entered September 10, 1963 and appellant asserting without contradiction that the copy served upon Mm was mailed on September 16, 1963 and received at Ms office on September 17, 1963. The claim, except as to the assault cause. of action, seems to have been timely filed (Tierney v. State of New York, 266 App, Diy. 434, affd. 292 N. Y. 523). Order reversed, on the lw and the facts, with costs to appellant; and motion granted, with costs. Gibson, P, J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bomboy v. State, 23 A.D.2d 713, 258 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

23 A.D.2d 713 (Bomboy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tierney v. State
54 N.E.2d 207 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)