Bombieri v. Nicholas

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Bombieri v. Nicholas

584 A.2d 254, 122 N.J. 196, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 938

DecidedJune 29, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 584 A.2d 254 (Bombieri v. Nicholas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bombieri v. Nicholas, 584 A.2d 254, 122 N.J. 196, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 938 (N.J. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, on plaintiffs’ application for leave to appeal and for emergent temporary relief, and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED [197]*197that plaintiffs’ motion for leave to appeal is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the portion of the June 19, 1990 order of the Appellate Division that denied plaintiffs’ motion for stay and the temporary placement of Donata Bombieri in the Bancroft School’s Community Program for Adults with Challenging Behavior pending disposition of the accelerated appeal in the Appellate Division is summarily reversed; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for a limited remand to the Division of Developmental Disabilities for an expedited hearing is denied, without prejudice to plaintiffs’ renewal of that application in the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, on plaintiffs’ application for leave to appeal and for emergent temporary relief, and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED [197]*197that plaintiffs’ motion for leave to appeal is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the portion of the June 19, 1990 order of the Appellate Division that denied plaintiffs’ motion for stay and the temporary placement of Donata Bombieri in the Bancroft School’s Community Program for Adults with Challenging Behavior pending disposition of the accelerated appeal in the Appellate Division is summarily reversed; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for a limited remand to the Division of Developmental Disabilities for an expedited hearing is denied, without prejudice to plaintiffs’ renewal of that application in the Appellate Division.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

584 A.2d 254, 122 N.J. 196, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bombieri-v-nicholas-nj-1990.